William Deresiewicz:
If one of the disadvantages of an elite education is the temptation it offers to mediocrity, another is the temptation it offers to security. When parents explain why they work so hard to give their children the best possible education, they invariably say it is because of the opportunities it opens up. But what of the opportunities it shuts down? An elite education gives you the chance to be rich—which is, after all, what we’re talking about—but it takes away the chance not to be. Yet the opportunity not to be rich is one of the greatest opportunities with which young Americans have been blessed. We live in a society that is itself so wealthy that it can afford to provide a decent living to whole classes of people who in other countries exist (or in earlier times existed) on the brink of poverty or, at least, of indignity. You can live comfortably in the United States as a schoolteacher, or a community organizer, or a civil rights lawyer, or an artist—that is, by any reasonable definition of comfort. You have to live in an ordinary house instead of an apartment in Manhattan or a mansion in L.A.; you have to drive a Honda instead of a BMW or a Hummer; you have to vacation in Florida instead of Barbados or Paris, but what are such losses when set against the opportunity to do work you believe in, work you’re suited for, work you love, every day of your life?
Yet it is precisely that opportunity that an elite education takes away. How can I be a schoolteacher—wouldn’t that be a waste of my expensive education? Wouldn’t I be squandering the opportunities my parents worked so hard to provide? What will my friends think? How will I face my classmates at our 20th reunion, when they’re all rich lawyers or important people in New York? And the question that lies behind all these: Isn’t it beneath me? So a whole universe of possibility closes, and you miss your true calling.
(HT Maggie's Farm via Joe Carter)
2 comments:
oh my goodness.. ! wow
I disagree that an elite education takes away those more modest career choices.
In fact, many of those who go to an elite university do end up taking a very nontraditional path.
Indeed, it is in the most intellectual tradition to seek out unique expressions of living one's life.
One good example is Barack Obama, who after graduating from Columbia University became a community organizer, and then after graduating Harvard Law became a civil rights attorney.
Henry David Thoreau was also a Harvard man.
Ultimately, I don't think it matters so much which university you attend, but a life philosophy that for each person comes from a unique variety of sources, including parents, church, friends, and of course school.
Post a Comment