Friday, August 24, 2007

Men: Threat or Menace?

Are We Teaching Our Kids To Be Fearful of Men?

When children get lost in a mall, they're supposed to find a "low-risk adult" to help them. Guidelines issued by police departments and child-safety groups often encourage them to look for "a pregnant woman," "a mother pushing a stroller" or "a grandmother."

The implied message: Men, even dads pushing strollers, are "high-risk."

Are we teaching children that men are out to hurt them? The answer, on many fronts, is yes. Child advocate John Walsh advises parents to never hire a male babysitter. Airlines are placing unaccompanied minors with female passengers rather than male passengers. Soccer leagues are telling male coaches not to touch players.

Child-welfare groups say these are necessary precautions, given that most predators are male. But fathers' rights activists and educators now argue that an inflated predator panic is damaging men's relationships with kids. Some men are opting not to get involved with children at all, which partly explains why many youth groups can't find male leaders, and why just 9% of elementary-school teachers are male, down from 18% in 1981.

People assume that all men "have the potential for violence and sexual aggressiveness," says Peter Stearns, a George Mason University professor who studies fear and anxiety. Kids end up viewing every male stranger "as a potential evildoer," he says, and as a byproduct, "there's an overconfidence in female virtues." . . . One abused child is one too many. Still, it's important to maintain perspective. "The number of men who will hurt a child is tiny compared to the population," says Benjamin Radford, who researches statistics on predators and is managing editor of the science magazine Skeptical Inquirer. "Virtually all of the time, if a child is lost or in trouble, he will be safe going to the nearest male stranger."

Glenn Reynolds writes:

If you stereotyped on race the same way, you'd be regarded as a hopeless bigot.

He's absolutely right.

I spent two summers during college working in child development for the US Army. (Basically day camp for K-6. It was a great job -- I got payed to play and go swimming with the kids every day.) Occasionally, they'd be short-handed and need for me to help with the infants and toddlers. Whenever I did, they would never let me change diapers or be left alone with the kids because I am male. While I really didn't mind not changing diapers, it was certainly an example of this type of discrimination.

2 comments:

Unknown said...

Functional societies have a specific way to function: 'There are no rights or privileges without responsibility. The opposite is also true, there is no responsibility without an associated right.'

So it's OK if females are viewed as victims whenever it suits them regardless of the fact that in the last three years females sexually assaulting males has gone up significantly (witness the teachers who are assaulting students).

As a husband, father of five and a student physician, I am tired of the war on men. Women have to realize until they stop viewing it as 'In order for us to win, men must lose' society as a whole will lose.

Not all men are predators, not all women are necessarily victims or good just because they are women.

Nicholas Donovan

SMART AND PLDT said...

I have done much study on John Walsh since he has come out with hate for men and or males. I think it must have something to do with his sex addiction problem as reported on Larry King CNN.

http://johnwalshournewgod.blogspot.com/